Minutes, IBIS Quality Committee 04 Mar 2008 11-12 AM EST (8-9 AM PST) ROLL CALL Adam Tambone Barry Katz, SiSoft Benny Lazer Benjamin P Silva Bob Cox, Micron * Bob Ross, Teraspeed Consulting Group Brian Arsenault * David Banas, Xilinx * Eckhard Lenski, Nokia Siemens Networks Eric Brock * Guan Tao, Huawei Technologies Gregory R Edlund Hazem Hegazy John Figueroa John Angulo, Mentor Graphics Katja Koller, Nokia Siemens Networks Kevin Fisher * Kim Helliwell, LSI Logic Lance Wang, IOMethodology Lynne Green * Mike LaBonte, Cisco Systems Mike Mayer, SiSoft * Moshiul Haque, Micron Technology Peter LaFlamme Randy Wolff, Micron Technology Radovan Vuletic, Qimonda Robert Haller, Enterasys Roy Leventhal, Leventhal Design & Communications Sherif Hammad, Mentor Graphics Todd Westerhoff, SiSoft Tom Dagostino, Teraspeed Consulting Group Kazuyoshi Shoji, Hitachi Sadahiro Nonoyama Everyone in attendance marked by * NOTE: "AR" = Action Required. -----------------------MINUTES --------------------------- Mike LaBonte conducted the meeting. Call for patent disclosure: - No one declared a patent. AR Review: AR: Mike propose addition to 5.2.5 to clarify that [Model Spec] Vinl/Vinh are not always needed - Done AR: Mike invite Walter Katz to talk about measurements BIRDs - Mike has asked Walter Katz again, waiting for reply New items: Discussion of Anders Eckholm email on ibis-list: - There are 2 sets of overshoot limits: - Device no longer functions correctly - Device is destroyed - IBIS static overshoot is found in "Absolute Maximum Ratings" - Dynamic overshoot is a relaxation of the static requirement - David: different voltages appear in "Recommended Operating Conditions" - This is the functional guarantee - This is what IBIS should specify - Delete this sentence: "Typically these are voltages that would cause the physical component to be destroyed." - Eckhard will contact Anders about writing a BIRD Where do we stand we on our response to JEDEC? - David has produced a document - He is waiting for feedback from group - It may be missing content for some items - Mike may have some notes to send AR: Mike check status of JEDEC response document Continued review of the IQ specification: 5.3.4. {LEVEL 3} [Pullup] voltage sweep range is correct - We deleted the monotonicity requirement - This is covered in 5.3.9 - Moshiul: if the clamp reference is different from the pullup reference, should all tables cover the higher voltage range? - We made wording changes 5.3.5. {LEVEL 3} [Pulldown] voltage sweep range is correct 5.3.6. {LEVEL 3} [POWER Clamp] voltage sweep range is correct - Wording changes similar to 5.3.4 applied to these. Next meeting: 11 Mar 2008 11-12 AM EST (8-9 AM PST) Meeting ended at 12:03 PM Eastern Time.